ABSTRACT
Intensive care units are considered life-saving medical services and a vital component of healthcare systems. These specialized hospital wards contain the life support machines and technical expertise to sustain seriously ill and injured bodies. However, as the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, intensive care is an expensive, finite resource which is not necessarily available to all citizens, and which may be unjustly rationed. As a result, the intensive care unit may contribute more towards biopolitical narratives of investment in lifesaving than measurable improvements in population health. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork and a decade of involvement in clinical research, this paper examines everyday activities of lifesaving in the intensive care unit and interrogates epistemological assumptions upon which they are organized. A closer look at how healthcare professionals, medical devices, patients, and families accept, refuse, and modify imposed boundaries of bodily finitude reveals how activities of lifesaving often lead to uncertainty and may even impose harm when they deny possibilities for desired death. Refiguring death as a personal ethical threshold, rather than inherently tragic ending, challenges the power of the logic of lifesaving and instead insists on greater attention towards improving conditions for living.